DOES BELIEF IN HUMAN EVOLUTION ENTAIL KUFR (DISBELIEF)? EVALUATING THE CONCERNS OF A MUSLIM THEOLOGIAN
Source of Publication
© 2020 by the Joint Publication Board of Zygon Nuh Ha Mim Keller, a contemporary Muslim theologian, argues against the compatibility of evolution and Islam. In this article we intend to critically evaluate his position in which he advances three separate arguments. First, he criticizes the science of evolution. Second, he demonstrates the metaphysical problems with naturalism and the role of chance in the enterprise of evolution. Third, he contends that evolution and the creationist narrative in Islamic scripture is irresolvable. Given these points, Keller concludes that believing in human evolution takes one outside the fold of Islam (kufr). After reviewing each of these points we argue that his claims are unwarranted because of other possibilities which Keller may have not considered. In effect, we argue that believing in evolution doesn't necessarily or definitively entail kufr.
Malik, Shoaib Ahmed and Kulieva, Elvira, "DOES BELIEF IN HUMAN EVOLUTION ENTAIL KUFR (DISBELIEF)? EVALUATING THE CONCERNS OF A MUSLIM THEOLOGIAN" (2020). Scopus Indexed Articles. 88.