Orientations to Interpersonal Arguing in the United Arab Emirates, with Comparisons to the United States, China, and India

Author First name, Last name, Institution

Chrysi Rapanta, Zayed University
Dale Hample, University of Maryland

Document Type

Article

Source of Publication

Journal of Intercultural Communication Research

Publication Date

1-1-2015

Abstract

© 2015 World Communication Association. United Arab Emirates (UAE) is currently a hub of 200 nationalities with a variety of lifestyles and religions. Nonetheless, the attitudes of locals towards reasoning with others have not yet been investigated. This investigation studied fundamental orientations to arguing among UAE residents (N = 157), with a range of self-report instruments including argument frames, personalization of conflict, argumentativeness, and verbal aggressiveness. Data analysis showed that UAE respondents had responses comparable to three comparison countries (US, India, and China) in terms of argument motives, but they manifested differences regarding argument frames and taking conflict personally. These are discussed in relation to cultural dimensions and their significance for business and education.

ISSN

1747-5759

Publisher

Routledge

Volume

44

Issue

4

First Page

263

Last Page

287

Disciplines

Education

Keywords

Argument Motives, Argumentativeness, Conflict, Culture, Interpersonal Arguing, UAE

Scopus ID

84943454532

Indexed in Scopus

yes

Open Access

no

Share

COinS