Document Type
Article
Source of Publication
Education Policy Analysis Archives
Publication Date
1-1-2021
Abstract
Education has traditionally been classroom-oriented with a gradual growth of online courses in recent times. However, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically accelerated the shift to online classes. Associated with this learning format is the question: what do people think about the educational value of an online course compared to a course taken in-person in a classroom? We address this question and present a Bayesian quantile analysis of public opinion using a nationally representative survey data from the United States. We find that previous participation in online courses and full-time employment status favor the educational value of online courses. We also find that the older demographic and females have a greater propensity for online education. In contrast, highly educated individuals have a lower willingness towards online education vis-a-vis traditional classes. Regional variations in the propensity to value online classes also exist. Besides, covariate effects show heterogeneity across quantiles which cannot be captured using probit or logit models.
DOI Link
ISSN
Publisher
Arizona State University
Volume
29
Disciplines
Education
Keywords
Binary outcomes, COVID-19, online education, Gibbs sampling, public, opinion, Pew Research Center
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Ojha, Manini and Rahman, Mohammad Arshad, "Do Online Courses Provide an Equal Educational Value Compared to In-Person Classroom Teaching? Evidence from U.S. Survey Data using Quantile Regression" (2021). All Works. 4796.
https://zuscholars.zu.ac.ae/works/4796
Indexed in Scopus
no
Open Access
yes
Open Access Type
Gold: This publication is openly available in an open access journal/series