Digital evidence before the administrative courts in Jordan
Document Type
Article
Source of Publication
International Journal of Electronic Governance
Publication Date
1-1-2023
Abstract
This study explores the extent to which the Jordanian legislator uses digital evidence before the administrative courts and its legal bearing in protecting the rights of individuals when dealing with their use in administration. The paper concludes by discussing approaches to challenging the validity of digital evidence before the administrative judge. The absence of legislation on evidence in the administrative judiciary. This study adopts the descriptive analytical approach to analyse the legislative texts related to the subject, followed by comparing the Jordanian and Egyptian legislative systems to identify the strengths and weaknesses. This study found that the Jordanian and comparative legislation stipulates that the authoritativeness of digital documents has the same power as the authoritativeness of an ordinary written document in proof, provided that it is preserved from change and can be referred to at any time and that it identifies the person from whom it was issued.
DOI Link
ISSN
Publisher
Inderscience Publishers
Volume
15
Issue
3
First Page
288
Last Page
309
Disciplines
Law
Keywords
administrative judiciary, digital document, digital proof, digital scripts, email
Scopus ID
Recommended Citation
AlOmran, Nayel and Al-Hilat, Oday Mohammad, "Digital evidence before the administrative courts in Jordan" (2023). All Works. 6155.
https://zuscholars.zu.ac.ae/works/6155
Indexed in Scopus
yes
Open Access
no