Document Type

Article

Source of Publication

Corporate Law and Governance Review

Publication Date

7-16-2026

Abstract

This paper explores the evolving transition from automation to adjudication by examining the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in dispute settlement processes. It assesses how AI can enhance procedural efficiency, support judicial reasoning, and improve access to justice. Adopting a qualitative and interpretive approach, the study analyzes academic scholarship, policy frameworks, and comparative international practices to understand the integration of AI within judicial and quasi-judicial settings (Abedi et al., 2025). The findings suggest that while AI significantly improves administrative processes and provides valuable decision-support tools, it also raises critical concerns regarding algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and the risk of excessive reliance on automated systems. The paper argues that AI should complement rather than replace human adjudicators, operating within robust frameworks that ensure accountability, transparency, and fairness. It ultimately proposes a hybrid model in which AI enhances dispute resolution mechanisms while preserving the essential human elements of judgment, legitimacy, and ethical reasoning central to the rule of law.

ISSN

2707-1111

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Volume

8

Issue

3

First Page

160

Last Page

169

Disciplines

Computer Sciences | Law

Keywords

Access to Justice, Algorithmic Bias, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Dispute Settlement, Governance, Rule of Law

Scopus ID

105047062785

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Indexed in Scopus

yes

Open Access

yes

Open Access Type

Hybrid: This publication is openly available in a subscription-based journal/series

Share

COinS